| | Question about Chew Clock. |  |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
emmdotfrisk
Posts : 33
Join date : 2010-09-05
 |  Subject: Question about Chew Clock.  Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:09 am | |
| I have a question for you guys, I want to know what you think....
Air Force isn't the greatest team, and they run 80% of the time. They pride themselves on being hard nosed and effective. A pillar in their strategy is clock control. With that being said is it frowned upon for me to have the game tempo part of gameplanning on conservative all game? This means I would essentially be chewing the clock down to 5-10 seconds every play.
Let me know your thoughts as I will do whatever you guys want! | |
|
 | |
G_T_G
Posts : 44
Join date : 2010-09-05
Location : IL, USA
| | Subject: Re: Question about Chew Clock. Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:50 am | |
| I would have absolutely nothing against this.. seeing as how you had the balls to take Air Force, if that is your strategy I don't see any issues. That is totally sim. Due to your personnel, that is the best way for you to win and I don't see any issues whatsoever. | |
|
| | |
emmdotfrisk
Posts : 33
Join date : 2010-09-05
| | Subject: Re: Question about Chew Clock. Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:50 pm | |
| yeah taking Air Force kinda makes me look like an Asshat, but I hope I can put up a bit of a fight haha | |
|
| | |
controllerabuser
Posts : 40
Join date : 2010-09-06
| | Subject: Re: Question about Chew Clock. Thu Sep 16, 2010 1:08 pm | |
| - emmdotfrisk wrote:
- I have a question for you guys, I want to know what you think....
Air Force isn't the greatest team, and they run 80% of the time. They pride themselves on being hard nosed and effective. A pillar in their strategy is clock control. With that being said is it frowned upon for me to have the game tempo part of gameplanning on conservative all game? This means I would essentially be chewing the clock down to 5-10 seconds every play.
Let me know your thoughts as I will do whatever you guys want! CHEESE jk.. I think it is fine.. Depending on the quarter length. If it is 7-8 minutes then I have no problem whatsoever with it. | |
|
| | |
emmdotfrisk
Posts : 33
Join date : 2010-09-05
| | Subject: Re: Question about Chew Clock. Thu Sep 16, 2010 1:18 pm | |
| yeah tbh I havent ever done it before, but thought about it.... | |
|
| | |
MG
Admin
Posts : 42
Join date : 2010-09-05
| | Subject: Re: Question about Chew Clock. Thu Sep 16, 2010 1:55 pm | |
| See if it was 5 minute quarters I would be apposed but we are doing 7 minute quarters and its a fair strategy that makes sense, especially with a running team like Air Force. I have nothing against it, if a team complains STOP THEM and get the ball back. | |
|
| | |
controllerabuser
Posts : 40
Join date : 2010-09-06
| | Subject: Re: Question about Chew Clock. Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:43 pm | |
| - MG wrote:
- See if it was 5 minute quarters I would be apposed but we are doing 7 minute quarters and its a fair strategy that makes sense, especially with a running team like Air Force. I have nothing against it, if a team complains STOP THEM and get the ball back.
No doubt boss! It isn't like he is taking advantage of a flaw or anything. It is real life. | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Question about Chew Clock. | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Question about Chew Clock. | |
|
